Multi-billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk seems to think so. He puts the chance we’re not as one on billions. Why so? Well, in the past five decades, computers have become half a billion times faster, taking us from this…to convincing, immersive virtual worlds. Futurologists at Google predict that, by 2040, we’ll be spending half our lives in simulations that are indistinguishable from the real. Fast forward hundreds, perhaps thousands, of years and our descendants will be so advanced that they’ll run so-called ‘ancestor simulations’ that re-tell the history of who they are and where they’re from. For anyone living in that simulation, there would be no way of knowing. And here’s the twists… Musk believes this has already happened. That would mean that the whole of time, from the beginning of the universe, and all human history is a simulation. Not only that, Musk hopes this is the case because it’ll mean that future civilisations will have survived long enough to advance these technologies; a better prospect than the reality we might otherwise be facing. So, would you be against the man who has reimagined space exploration? Well some people are hedging theirs. Two secretive Silicon Valley investors are reportedly employing scientists to break us out of these simulations. If they succeed, who will they find is running the show?
ChatGPT
Elon Musk’s perspective is based on the Simulation Hypothesis. This idea, which has gained traction in certain tech and philosophical circles, posits that if a sufficiently advanced civilization could create a simulation of reality that is indistinguishable from “real” reality, then it’s probable that we’re living in such a simulation.
In this view, our universe, with its complex laws of physics and intricate histories, could just be a sophisticated computer program running on the servers of a far-future civilization. This concept is also underpinned by observations about the rate of technological development. If you consider the rate at which our own technology is advancing, it’s not outlandish to conceive that a future civilization could create such a simulation.
As to why Musk and others hope this is true, it comes down to a question of survival. If we’re in a simulation, it means some civilization has survived long enough to create such advanced technology. This could be seen as a positive sign that long-term survival and advancement are possible, despite the many existential risks we face.
The concept of “breaking out” of the simulation, as the Silicon Valley investors you mentioned are aiming for, is even more speculative. If we are indeed in a simulation, we don’t yet understand the “rules” of that simulation well enough to know if breaking out is possible, or what that would entail. If it were possible, the implications would be monumental, potentially revealing an entirely different level of reality and possibly the beings responsible for the creation of the simulation.
These ideas, while fascinating, are highly speculative and not universally accepted. They are based on a series of assumptions about the nature of reality, the progression of technology, and the motivations of future civilizations. As of now, there is no empirical evidence supporting the simulation hypothesis, but it serves as a thought-provoking topic of discussion.